What Is Maintenance?

Hiring a lawyer is the first step towards recovering a better quality of life. At Osborne & Francis, we devote our undivided attention to each client, and all communications are held in the strictest privacy. Contact us by filling out the form or calling us directly at (561) 293-2600.

By Pierce | Skrabanek
Published on:
May 20, 2014
Updated on:
April 7, 2024
Best Law Firm logo
Best Law Firm logo

When a Jones Act seaman becomes ill and injured while in the service of his/her ship, the shipowner must pay him maintenance and cure whether the shipowner was at fault or whether the ship was unseaworthy. Guevara v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 59 F.3d 1496, 1499 (5th Cir. 1995) (emphasis added). When there are ambiguities or doubts, they are resolved in favor of the seaman. Vaughan v. Atkinson, 369 U.S. 527, 532, 82 S.Ct. 997 (1962).  Moreover, Plaintiff is entitled to maintenance and cure until the date of maximum possible cure, when no further treatment will improve the condition. Johnson v. Marlin Drilling Co., 893 F.2d 77, 79 (5th Cir. 1990).  This presents a strategic advantage to Jones Act seaman in cases where there is questionable or no liability on the part of the employer. Moreover, a seaman is entitled to be paid maintenance until a doctor provides an opinion that he/she has reach maximum medical improvement.  Maximum medical improvement means the seaman has reached a point in his/her care where he/she will get no better and only palliative care will be necessary if any at all.

Maintenance covers an injured seaman’s food and lodging while cure pays for his/her medical expenses. Guevara, 59 F.3d at 1499. The burden of producing evidence of expenses is feather light, and a court may award reasonable expenses, even if the precise amount of actual expenses is not conclusively proved.Hall v. Noble Drilling (U.S.), Inc., 242 F.3d 582, 58 (5th Cir. 2001); See alsoYelverton v. Mobil Laboratories, Inc., 782 F.2d 555, 558 (5th Cir. 1986) (noting that a seaman=s Aown testimony as to reasonable cost of room and board in the community where he is living is sufficient to support an award.).  The Fifth Circuit has upheld maintenance rates of $30.50 and $31.50 per day.  See Hall v. Noble Drilling (U.S.) Inc., 242 F.3d 582, 591 (5th Cir. 2001); see also Nichols v. Weeks Marine, Inc., 513 F.Supp.2d 627, 639 (E.D. La. 2007) (finding that a maintenance rate of $30.00 per day is reasonable and appropriate in this case); Atlantic Sounding Co. v. Curette, 2006 WL 1560793, at *3 (E.D. La. May 16, 2006) (finding maintenance rate of $30.00 per day reasonable); Lodrigue v. Delta Towing, L.L.C., 2003 WL 22999425, at *11 (E.D. La. Dec. 19, 2003) (finding $31.00 to be reasonable approximation).  We have been successful in the past in having courts award a greater rate than the ones cited by Nichols and Atlantic Sounding.  In moving to compel maintenance, provide an affidavit from your client detailing his/her actual living expenses and attach supporting bills.  The aggregate amount divided by 30 days yields a daily maintenance rate.  You can include rent/mortgage, vehicle, gas, electricity, cable, phone, and groceries attributable to the seaman himself.  Many times, this daily rate will far exceed the $30-$31 cited in case law.

For more information regarding Jones Act and Maritime cases, please contact us. Our lawyers have obtained millions of dollars in verdicts and settlements for clients injured offshore. These consistent results have led to our induction into the Million Dollar Advocates Forum and we have been nominated as Rising Stars by Texas Monthly.

Ready For Your Free Consultation?

What Our Clients Are Saying About Us

“If you're looking for a great firm, then look no further!”

“Everyone at Pierce Skrabanek was so helpful to our case. They worked fast and efficiently and kept us notified of the status of our case. They helped us a lot and made sure we understood what was happening and why. If you're looking for a great firm, then look no further! I can't recommend them enough. They truly changed our lives. Five Stars on all accounts!”

Samantha S.

“I greatly appreciate all of their help!”

Mr. Skrabanek and his team are all very diligent, thorough, and hard-working. For my first time ever needing a lawyer, I had a great experience. They walked me through the process and answered all of my questions along the way and in a timely manner. I greatly appreciate all of their help!”

Tori P.

“I’m very pleased with my results.”

“They took care of me from start to finish! I’m very pleased with my results. I will 100% recommend it to my friend's family or just another person who needs good help in a bad situation. Thank you to Paul and the whole team!”

Jon J.

“Pierce Skrabanek represented me in a very high-profile wrongful death case.”

“Pierce Skrabanek represented me in a very high-profile wrongful death case. Whenever I felt uninformed or just needed reassurance, Paul had no problems getting on the phone with me to clear up any questions I had.

This firm was very professional through the entire process.”

Jeremy S.

“Pierce Skrabanek was polite, professional, and direct at all times.”

“When I needed help, they were there. I reached out to over 5 other firms, but all declined to assist. Pierce Skrabanek was polite, professional, and direct at all times. Just awesome”

Al B.

“This law firm treats you as family.”

“Every person I came in communication with was a great person. This law firm treats you as family and will do anything to get the best for you.”

Andres T.