Why Can't You Accept My Generic Lawsuit?

Hiring a lawyer is the first step towards recovering a better quality of life. At Osborne & Francis, we devote our undivided attention to each client, and all communications are held in the strictest privacy. Contact us by filling out the form or calling us directly at (561) 293-2600.

By Pierce | Skrabanek
Published on:
July 8, 2014
Updated on:
May 12, 2024
Best Law Firm logo
Best Law Firm logo

A frequent question that we receive from our clients is why we are unable to accept their generic pharmaceutical lawsuit. Unfortunately, a United States Supreme Court ruling that came out in 2011 has affected our ability to handle these cases.

Pharmaceutical injury cases are premised on the drug manufacturer’s failure to warn of serious side effects associated with its product which results in an injury to the consumer of that product.  On June 23, 2011, the United States Supreme Court in Pliva, Inc. v. Mensing ruled that the makers of generic drugs cannot be sued for failing to warn of risks associated with their products.  While federal law requires the brand name manufacturers to update their drug labels as new side effects or warnings are necessary, the Supreme Court ruled that this duty does not extend to the makers of generic drugs because federal regulations require those drugs to carry the same warnings as their brand-name counterparts. The court concluded that state laws requiring generic drug manufacturers to change their product labels would result in product warnings that differ from those of their brand-name counterparts, are “pre-empted” by federal law prohibiting such differences.  The court also suggested it is the responsibility of Congress and the FDA to revise federal regulations in a way that would allow lawsuits against the makers of generic drugs.

This decision has caused hundreds of lawsuits against generic pharmaceutical companies to be dismissed. What once seemed like such a small decision, whether to opt for the pricey brand name drug or cheaper generic version now affects whether you can maintain a lawsuit against the manufacturer of the drug. What is worse, in many instances, patients are not even told whether they are receiving a generic or brand name drug. The pharmacist will often unilaterally make the decision to fill a prescription with a generic drug unless the patient specifically asks for the brand.

This ruling has very significant consequences because nearly 80 percent of the prescriptions in the United States are generic with many states allowing pharmacists to fill a generic in place of a brand name drug. However, there is some light under the tunnel, a consumer advocacy organization, Public Citizen has petitioned the FDA to change their requirements and force generic companies to change their labels. A copy of the petition can be found here.   We remain hopeful that Congress and the FDA will take note of this grave injustice and make changes to allow consumers to sue for injuries resulting from the ingestion of a generic drug. The FDA recently created a proposed rule to hold generic drug manufacturers responsible for the labeling of their drugs.

Ready For Your Free Consultation?

What Our Clients Are Saying About Us

“If you're looking for a great firm, then look no further!”

“Everyone at Pierce Skrabanek was so helpful to our case. They worked fast and efficiently and kept us notified of the status of our case. They helped us a lot and made sure we understood what was happening and why. If you're looking for a great firm, then look no further! I can't recommend them enough. They truly changed our lives. Five Stars on all accounts!”

Samantha S.

“I greatly appreciate all of their help!”

Mr. Skrabanek and his team are all very diligent, thorough, and hard-working. For my first time ever needing a lawyer, I had a great experience. They walked me through the process and answered all of my questions along the way and in a timely manner. I greatly appreciate all of their help!”

Tori P.

“I’m very pleased with my results.”

“They took care of me from start to finish! I’m very pleased with my results. I will 100% recommend it to my friend's family or just another person who needs good help in a bad situation. Thank you to Paul and the whole team!”

Jon J.

“Pierce Skrabanek represented me in a very high-profile wrongful death case.”

“Pierce Skrabanek represented me in a very high-profile wrongful death case. Whenever I felt uninformed or just needed reassurance, Paul had no problems getting on the phone with me to clear up any questions I had.

This firm was very professional through the entire process.”

Jeremy S.

“Pierce Skrabanek was polite, professional, and direct at all times.”

“When I needed help, they were there. I reached out to over 5 other firms, but all declined to assist. Pierce Skrabanek was polite, professional, and direct at all times. Just awesome”

Al B.

“This law firm treats you as family.”

“Every person I came in communication with was a great person. This law firm treats you as family and will do anything to get the best for you.”

Andres T.