Smith & Nephew R3 Recall

Best Lawyer Best Law Firms U.S. News & World Report Rankings Badge

In June 2012, Smith & Nephew recalled the metal socket liner used in its R3 Acetabular hip system. The R3 metal liner was introduced to the market in 2009. It is estimated that about 7,700 have been implanted in patients since 2009. Smith & Nephew claimed that it was “not satisfied with the clinical results” of the liner. It is reported that patients have experienced adverse side effects from the R3 metal liner including infections, dislocations and fractures. There has also been a higher rate of revisions due to evidence of metallosis or metal ion debris.

The clinical data upon which Smith & Nephew is basing its withdrawal of the R3 from the market is the fact that 1.6 % of patients with the R3 will require revision surgery each year. This is above the 1% guideline that has been set by Britain’s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.

The United Kingdom’s Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has issued a medical device alert relating to the recalled R3 metal liner. The alert addressed the “increased rates of revision of MOM hip replacements when using the metal liner component of the R3 acetabular system.” The alert also addressed the fact that the revision percentage associated with the R3 metal liner is not in line with its guidelines. The MHRA asks that patients who have been implanted with R3 metal liner components undergo annual follow up for the life of the implant regardless of whether they are experiencing signs of failure. Importantly, the MHRA is asking that all patients undergo blood testing for metal ion levels which has been a common issue associated with metal-on-metal hip implants, particularly recalled or failed metal-on-metal devices.

Some of the common side effects and complications that might arise from having a recalled or failed R3 metal liner include:

  • Increased levels of metal ions
  • Increased metal wear rates which may cause metal debris
  • Osteolysis
  • Necrosis- death of the tissue surrounding the implant
  • Severe hip pain due to dislocation or metal wear
  • Revision surgery- surgery to remove the failed R3 metal liner
  • Pseudotumors

This recall follows in the footsteps of the Zimmer Durom hip implant recall in 2008 and the disastrous DePuy ASR metal-on-metal hip implant recall in August 2010. The recall of the R3 metal liner is the second recall of a metal hip component in 2012. On July 6, 2012, Stryker recalled its Rejuvenate and ABG II modular neck stems in the United States.

Metal-on-metal hip implants continue to pose significant health risks to patients who undergo implantation of these devices. The FDA has expressed serious concern about the benefits of metal-on-metal hip implants and recently asked 21 manufacturers to conduct research on the effects of metal debris and ions on patients with these implants.

No items found.
No items found.
Contact Pierce Skrabanek for legal help.
(832) 690-7000 |

do you still have questions?

contact our office to speak to a lawyer.


Smith & Nephew Hip Implant Lawsuits

A number of lawsuits have already been filed against Smith & Nephew. Patients who have received a defective Smith & Nephew hip implant are finding that the only way they can receive compensation for their injuries is to file a lawsuit against Smith & Nephew.

Once a preliminary evaluation is done on your case, you will receive a packet. The packet contains a contract, questionnaire and authorization. This information is necessary to further evaluate your claim and to obtain your medical records. Obtaining your medical records can take 3o to 60 days. After the medical records are retrieved, an attorney will review your records and a determination will be made on your case.

If your case is accepted, a lawsuit will be filed. Pharmaceutical and medical device cases are frequently grouped together or “consolidated” in one court before one judge. This helps the discovery process proceed more quickly and efficiently. These consolidations are known as “MDLs” or Multi-District Litigation. An MDL is not a class action. Your case will be evaluated, tried and ultimately settled on the merits of your particular case.


Read what our past clients have to say about our legal services. 

Daryl M.

5 star icon

“My experience with Mr. Skrabanek was honestly far better than all expectations that we had. He took care of us like we were family, making sure me and my wife always felt like a priority and walked us through all of the concerns that we had. If you are looking for a professional who truly cares for his clients you can stop the search. You won’t be disappointed.”

Denise J.

5 star icon

“Mike and his team helped me settle an injury claim case. I was informed and helped through every step and they were always professional and very responsive. I really enjoyed working with them.”

Victoria S.

5 star icon

“My attorney, Michael, did an amazing job with my case. He’s a straight shooter and has a vast knowledge of the law combined with an extensive amount of experience, making him a fantastic attorney. I fully recommend this firm.

Thank you Pierce Skrabenek!”

Gabriela C.

5 star icon

“Paul Skrabanek of the law firm Pierce Skrabanek was very professional and went above & beyond in handling my daughter's case. Very dedicated, worked diligently, and got justice for my family. If I could give a higher rating than 5 stars I would. Thank you and your firm for such tenacity.”

Raymond H.

5 star icon

“These guys are awesome, they were very informative from the beginning to end, working with them was super smooth, and I had all questions answered thoroughly. The whole team at this firm works to help in every way they can. They were able to get me the compensation I deserved and exceeded my expectations. If you’re ever in need of a stellar team to stand behind you and work for you, these guys are the ones you would want in your corner.

Thank you very much Paul and thank your team for me.”

Cam F.

5 star icon

“Working with Paul Skrabanek was a very positive experience. He helped me understand the legal process as someone who has never been a part of a lawsuit, and was able to get me settled quickly and painlessly! Loved working with Pierce Skrabanek law firm!”

Michele R.

5 star icon

Michael Pierce and his team, especially Krystle, were very professional, always available (even on weekends), and very knowledgeable. We appreciate their hard work on our case and the time they took to explain every detail as our case progressed. Mike is a phenomenal attorney and we highly recommend them for your legal needs.”

Beverly C.

5 star icon

“I found Mr. Skrabanek to be very trustworthy, creditable, and genuinely concerned about my well-being while I was going through this very difficult process. He showed constant concern for me being completely satisfied before making any final decisions.”

Diane T.

5 star icon

“Fantastic team of attorneys and staff dedicated to their clients. Michael Pierce is an outstanding trial attorney for personal injury cases.”

Deborah S.

5 star icon

“We watched, participated & listened to Paul Skrabanek fight for a settlement which we could be happy with. Just this month the case has been put to rest.”

Please fill out the form below for your


Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Smith & Nephew Hip Implant Injury Lawyers

If you’ve been harmed by a defective Smith & Nephew hip replacement, speaking to a qualified lawyer experienced in handling medical device cases is your best course of action. An attorney from Pierce | Skrabanek will provide a free case evaluation and analyze the facts of your case. We handle all cases on a contingency basis, meaning that we don’t get paid unless we win.

Frequently Asked Questions