// Cookiebot logo hiding a#CybotCookiebotDialogPoweredbyCybot, div#CybotCookiebotDialogPoweredByText { display: none; } #CookiebotWidget .CookiebotWidget-body .CookiebotWidget-main-logo { display: none; }
We are dedicated to helping those who have been injured or affected by a catastrophic injury. You may contact us 24/7 at (832) 690-7000 for a free, confidential consultation or to schedule an appointment with us.
Truck crashes are rarely just about the driver. We uncover who else may be responsible.









Truck accidents are different from typical passenger vehicle crashes because responsibility may extend well beyond the driver. A trucking company, vehicle owner, cargo company, maintenance provider, manufacturer, or another business could share responsibility for the collision and your injuries.
Determining truck accident liability is an essential part of your personal injury claim. Identifying every responsible party helps establish what happened, why it happened, and which individuals, companies, and insurance policies should be included in your claim.
Our truck accident lawyers at Pierce Skrabanek have extensive experience handling these claims. We understand the federal and state rules governing commercial trucking and know how to investigate the companies and records behind an 18-wheeler crash.
Contact us at (832) 690-7000 for a free consultation about your case.
Liability refers to legal responsibility for a collision and the resulting injuries and losses. In a commercial trucking case, determining liability requires looking at the actions of the driver as well as the companies responsible for putting that truck on the road.
Large tractor-trailers weigh significantly more than other motor vehicles:
That weight difference contributes to the severity of many commercial vehicle crashes, but it does not tell us who caused one.
The liability investigation looks at issues such as the driver's conduct, hours behind the wheel, vehicle maintenance, cargo securement, company safety practices, and whether federal or state safety requirements were violated.
Several parties may be responsible for the same truck accident. At Pierce Skrabanek, we investigate the commercial operation behind the vehicle to determine whose conduct contributed to the crash.
Potentially liable parties include:
Finding every responsible party is especially important when a crash causes catastrophic injuries and one insurance policy is not enough to cover the losses.
Commercial drivers must follow state traffic laws along with federal requirements established by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
Important truck driver regulations address:
These limits are designed in part to address driver fatigue. Electronic logging device records can help determine how long a driver had been working and driving before a collision.
Commercial trucks themselves are subject to extensive safety requirements.
Federal trucking regulations address areas such as:
A safety violation becomes especially important when it relates directly to the cause of a crash.
FMCSA rules establish specific safety duties for commercial drivers and motor carriers. When a trucking company or driver violates a rule relevant to a collision, that violation can become part of the liability case.
For example, a crash investigation may reveal that:
Federal violations do not eliminate the need to prove that the defendant's conduct caused the crash and your injuries. They can, however, provide important information about what the driver or company was required to do and where the safety failure occurred.
Large truck accidents can result from driver mistakes, mechanical failures, unsafe company practices, or a combination of problems.
Common factors include:
A complete investigation should look beyond the final driving error. A driver who lost control may have been operating on worn tires, carrying an improperly balanced load, or driving beyond permitted hours because of company scheduling practices.
Truck accidents frequently involve more than one responsible party. A fatigued driver could cause a crash while working for a company that encouraged excessive driving hours. A poorly maintained truck could also contain a defective component. Each responsible party must be evaluated separately.
This makes preserving information from the trucking operation critical. Trucking companies may repair damaged vehicles and return them to service, and electronic or business records can be overwritten or discarded through routine retention practices.
Important information can include:
Our attorneys can send preservation demands instructing the appropriate companies to retain relevant records and physical evidence.
Commercial trucking insurance becomes more complicated when vehicles and cargo travel across state lines.
Interstate carriers are subject to federal financial responsibility requirements, with minimum coverage levels varying based on the type of carrier and cargo. Additional policies could also apply through the motor carrier, truck owner, trailer owner, or other companies involved in the transportation arrangement.
The location of the crash and the businesses involved can also affect jurisdiction and applicable law. Pierce Skrabanek is based in Texas but has handled and won cases nationwide.
Our attorneys identify the responsible companies and applicable insurance coverage rather than assuming the driver's policy is the only source of recovery.
Truck accident victims are often facing trucking companies with experienced insurance carriers, investigators, and defense lawyers. Building the case requires showing what happened and connecting each defendant's conduct to the collision.
Generally, negligence requires proof that:
The evidence preserved after the crash helps establish those elements. Our attorneys can compare electronic logs with GPS and dispatch records, review inspection and maintenance histories, examine the driver's qualifications, interview witnesses, inspect the vehicles, and work with accident reconstruction and trucking safety experts.
Violations of statutes or regulations can also affect how negligence is established. In some circumstances, Texas law recognizes negligence per se, which uses the violation of an applicable statute as part of establishing the defendant's breach of duty. Whether that doctrine applies requires analysis of the particular law and facts involved.
A Martindale-Nolo survey found that more than 90% of personal injury claimants who hired an attorney received a settlement or award, compared with approximately half of those who handled their claims without legal representation.
The trucking company has people protecting its interests. You should too. Call Pierce Skrabanek at (832) 690-7000 for a free consultation.
There is no single legal theory that applies to every trucking crash. Our attorneys determine which claims are supported by the driver, company, vehicle, cargo, and other facts.
Those theories can include:
Understanding truck accident law requires examining the relationships among the companies involved rather than treating the collision like an ordinary two-driver accident.
A trucking company does not have to accept all of the blame for a claim to proceed. Texas follows a modified comparative responsibility system.
Under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 33.001, you cannot recover damages if your percentage of responsibility is greater than 50%. If you are 50% or less responsible, your damages are reduced according to the percentage assigned to you.
For example, if a jury determines that your losses total $500,000 but finds you 20% responsible for the collision, the award would be reduced by $100,000.
This rule gives defendants a reason to shift blame toward the injured person or another driver. Electronic truck data, dashcam footage, witness statements, physical damage, and accident reconstruction can help answer those allegations.
You should speak with your attorney before agreeing to give a recorded statement to the trucking company's insurer.
An adjuster may ask you to describe your speed, where you were looking, when you first saw the truck, what you said at the scene, and how you feel physically. Those questions may come before you have seen the police report, reviewed video of the crash, or know the extent of your injuries.
The statement becomes part of the insurer's file and can later be compared with medical records, deposition testimony, and other information. You do not need to speculate about something you do not remember or help another party's insurer investigate its defenses before you understand your rights.
Robert had spent more than 20 years as a truck driver when another big rig rear-ended him during an otherwise typical workday. He understood trucking, but he did not know what to expect from the legal process after becoming the injured person in a commercial truck crash.
He turned to truck accident attorney Mike Pierce. Robert describes being kept informed and involved throughout the case and being treated by Pierce Skrabanek as more than a client.
Semi-truck accidents can cause catastrophic injuries that require surgery, lengthy rehabilitation, time away from work, and ongoing medical care.
Compensation in a truck accident lawsuit may address:
Exemplary damages can also be available in cases meeting the requirements imposed by Texas law. The amount that can be recovered depends on the injuries, available insurance, responsible parties, and other facts established through the claim.
Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 16.003 generally gives an injured person two years to file a personal injury lawsuit. Wrongful death claims are also generally subject to a two-year limitations period.
That does not mean waiting until the deadline is a good strategy in a trucking case. The truck may be repaired, witnesses become harder to locate, and electronic or business records can disappear if steps are not taken to preserve them.
Other rules can affect the filing deadline in specific circumstances. An attorney can determine which deadline applies while also taking action to secure information needed for the case.
Pierce Skrabanek handles the investigation and litigation required to pursue a commercial trucking claim while you concentrate on your medical care.
Our attorneys can:
Pierce Skrabanek has recovered multi-million-dollar settlements and verdicts for injured clients across the country. Our attorneys have been recognized by organizations including the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum and Million Dollar Advocates Forum.
If you or someone you love suffered serious injuries in a truck accident, call (832) 690-7000 or contact us online for a free consultation.
Look for a law firm with experience handling commercial truck cases, trial experience, access to qualified experts, and a history of substantial verdicts and settlements.
Trucking cases require attorneys who know where to look for driver, vehicle, company, and electronic records and who have the resources to pursue claims against commercial carriers and their insurers.
Pierce Skrabanek has more than 30 years of combined legal experience and has recovered multi-million-dollar settlements and verdicts for injured clients nationwide.
Yes. An employer can be responsible for an employee's negligent driving within the scope of employment. A trucking company's own actions can also support claims involving negligent hiring, training, supervision, scheduling, inspection, or maintenance.
The driver's employment status and the relationships among the carrier, truck owner, contractors, and other companies need to be investigated before deciding who is responsible.
The driver's accusation does not determine fault. Texas allows an injured person to recover when they are 50% or less responsible, although their damages are reduced by their assigned percentage of responsibility.
Physical damage, electronic truck data, dashcam or surveillance footage, witness accounts, GPS information, and accident reconstruction can provide a clearer account of what happened.
The important issue for an injured person is not waiting for the trucking company to decide what it wants to retain. Certain records are subject to regulatory retention requirements, while other electronic information can be overwritten or lost through ordinary business practices.
An attorney can send a preservation demand identifying the information and physical evidence relevant to the crash and putting the appropriate parties on notice that it must be retained.
No. A regulatory violation can be important, but the relationship between that violation and the collision still needs to be established.
If a driver exceeded federal hours-of-service limits, for example, the investigation would look at whether fatigue contributed to the crash. If maintenance requirements were violated, the question becomes whether the neglected mechanical condition contributed to the truck losing control or failing to stop.
We know how tough things can get after an injury. That’s why we make your struggles our fight. With over three decades of combined experience, we’ve been the reliable allies our clients need, tackling financial hardships, physical pain, and major life changes. Our track record of successful verdicts and settlements speaks to our team’s passion and dedication to helping clients get the support and justice they need.
Summary: Paul obtained a $2 million settlement for an 18-wheeler driver who was rear-ended by another 18-wheeler driver in Louisiana. The claims were against the Defendant’s 18-wheeler driver as well as the company that employed him. The Plaintiff underwent two surgeries as a result of the collision. The case settled after numerous depositions to the satisfaction of the client.
Summary: Paul obtained a $565,000 settlement on behalf of a 62-year-old woman who was involved in a collision with an 18-wheeler in December 2010. The case was settled out of court at a second mediation the week before trial. The client filed suit against the truck driver and the trucking company in Dallas County, alleging that the truck driver ran a stop sign and caused a collision with her truck. The defendants alleged that the client was in the best position to avoid the collision simply by going around the truck. Ultimately, the client suffered a back injury that required surgery. The defendants contended that the 62-year-old's condition was related to a prior incident in 2007, when medical records showed herniations in her lower back and neck. After the first mediation, the mediator issued a proposal that both parties rejected. However, at a second mediation the week before trial, the defendants and their insurance carrier agreed to pay more than the amount proposed during the first mediation. Paul was the lead attorney on the case.